ParentingSiblingsFamily life
The Trouble With Calling a Child Easy
A kind word said in a hurry at the front door can become a part a child feels they must keep playing, and siblings notice every line of the script.
"Thank you for being the easy one."
It is one of the gentlest things a tired adult can say. Picture the morning. One child is by the door with both shoes on. The other is looking under a chair for a coat that is hanging, in plain sight, on its hook. You are holding two bags and a timetable that belongs to somebody else. The child with the shoes deserves thanks, so you give it. They look pleased for an instant. Then the pleasure becomes a task. Now they have to stay easy, and there is no room in that sentence for the morning they will need you to wait.
I wrote No One Is the Easy One because of that sentence and the hundred small ones like it. Most families do not set out to cast their children. The roles arrive through repetition. One child speaks quickly, so they become the noisy one. Another notices a dropped cup and helps clean it, so they become the helpful one. A child who needs extra time becomes the difficult one, even when the difficulty lives partly in a rushed schedule or a narrow hallway. We use these names to get through the day. Children can hear them as descriptions of who they must remain.
The book stays in the rooms where siblings actually meet and collide: the crowded doorway, the shared shelf, the birthday table with two slices of cake that are not quite the same size, the bedroom door one child wants closed and the other wants open. Every scene is invented, and they do not all happen in the same house. You will meet a single adult kneeling between two children at the door, a grandparent at a small work surface, siblings who share a room and siblings who move between homes. I wanted the ideas to be useful in a flat with one quiet desk, not only in a spacious house with a spare afternoon.
What I care about most is how small the changes can be. Not a new philosophy of parenting, but a different first sentence. Instead of naming the child, you can name what happened: she found the lost bag this morning; he is learning to ask for space when he is cross. Those descriptions are modest. They do not claim to know a whole personality, and they let a child be different tomorrow without making today untrue. Even praise can confine. The helper may not be allowed to rest. The sensible one may hear, under the compliment, that their sibling will get the choice and they will be expected to cope.
It is possible to name competence without making competence compulsory.
That line sits in the first chapter, and much of the book grows out of it. A child can be proud of helping. They should not become the person who manages the family mornings, or the one who is blamed when a sibling forgets their shoes.
Fairness gets its own long look, because "that is not fair" is rarely about the thing on the table. Children keep a living account of what happens to each of them. When one points at a slice of cake, the useful question is sometimes simply: which part? They may mean the cake. They may mean the small present their sibling was given on their own birthday to keep the peace. Equal looks attractive because it looks measurable, but children are not the same age and do not live the same days. The fair answer can be different for each child, as long as the principle behind it can travel from one to the other.
There are chapters, too, about the crash from the next room and the urge to ask who started it; about the child who has quietly taken on an invisible job; about the private door; and about the seasons when one child needs much more of you than the other. Each pairs a family scene with a few plain things to try: a question asked after voices have come down, a promise to come back that you actually keep, an apology that leaves the hurt child room to need more time.
I should say clearly what the book does not promise. It will not give you siblings who never quarrel. I do not believe in that household, and I suspect you do not either. What it offers is a more believable hope: that each child can stay a person rather than the loud one, the good one, the baby or the problem, and that a family can learn, often after a poor first attempt, to make room for all of them.
It is written for parents and caregivers in the long middle stretch, after the toddler years and before the teenage ones, when a child can argue a rule with astonishing skill and still want you to sit nearby while they start something new. You can read it from the beginning or open it at whichever room is loudest in your house this week.
If you have ever thanked one child and watched the other's face change, No One Is the Easy One begins at that same front door. Come in and stay a while.
More from the journal
More by Priya Sandhu
Discussion
House rules
- Sign how you like, but be one person. You may use the name on your account, a name of your own choosing, or none at all. What you may not do is wear somebody else's: no pen name of ours, no member's name but your own, and nothing that reads as the studio or its staff.
- Argue with the point, not the person. Robust disagreement is welcome; contempt is not.
- Nothing unlawful, hateful or harassing, nothing that identifies a private individual, and no advertising.
- Post only what is yours to post. That includes other people's writing and private correspondence.
- We may hide a remark, remove it, or close an account to the discussions, and we may do so without notice.
What a chosen name is and is not
A chosen name hides you from the room, not from us. Every remark stays linked to the account that wrote it, and the studio can see that link whenever it needs to. Please treat it as a way to speak freely, not as a way to say something you would not put your name to.
Where responsibility sits
Remarks in this thread are written by members and published without prior review. They are the views of the people who wrote them and not those of eQuill Studio. We do not verify their accuracy, and we accept no liability for them or for any decision taken in reliance on them.
If something here breaks these rules or infringes your rights, report it and we will look at it promptly.
House rules
- Sign how you like, but be one person. You may use the name on your account, a name of your own choosing, or none at all. What you may not do is wear somebody else's: no pen name of ours, no member's name but your own, and nothing that reads as the studio or its staff.
- Argue with the point, not the person. Robust disagreement is welcome; contempt is not.
- Nothing unlawful, hateful or harassing, nothing that identifies a private individual, and no advertising.
- Post only what is yours to post. That includes other people's writing and private correspondence.
- We may hide a remark, remove it, or close an account to the discussions, and we may do so without notice.
What a chosen name is and is not
A chosen name hides you from the room, not from us. Every remark stays linked to the account that wrote it, and the studio can see that link whenever it needs to. Please treat it as a way to speak freely, not as a way to say something you would not put your name to.
Where responsibility sits
Remarks in this thread are written by members and published without prior review. They are the views of the people who wrote them and not those of eQuill Studio. We do not verify their accuracy, and we accept no liability for them or for any decision taken in reliance on them.
If something here breaks these rules or infringes your rights, report it and we will look at it promptly.
This thread belongs to this piece alone. Members choose how they are signed, and can change it from the box below. When the studio or the writer joins in, the page says so with a badge, so you always know who is talking.
OPENING THE THREAD…